🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume atomic talks with Washington provided that it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said only diplomacy was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had been made by mediators to reopen talks with the American leadership. He claimed Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to permit the global atomic watchdog to visit attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is navigating a complex route since Iran does not want appear to be operating from a stance of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more powerful in military terms and mentally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the impasse in the previous talks.

Previous Discussions Unexpectedly Concluded

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that ended with Donald Trump asserting the sites had been destroyed. Following this, EU nations used their privilege to reinstate international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Officials claimed three times they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Current Position

Iran's diplomats stated the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be revived in some form if talks restart.

The US president last week stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to restart talks, but confidentially Iranian officials state they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from the United States either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of passivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Standpoint

In his remarks to the gathering, designed to depict the US as a controlling nation that misuses the idea of international law, the foreign minister said the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the conflict could not be ended by combat operations. He stated the attacks began with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with complete American awareness and collaboration, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Dialogue Continues the Primary Solution

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was the United States and the European states that had always sought to dictate their demands during the discussions. Dialogue can still be alive and stays the ultimate solution to settle disagreements, but its criteria, rules and tenets must be respected."

"Provided that they address to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and honor, they will get a reply in the identical tone."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was certain Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We gained many lessons from this conflict; we have identified our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He stated: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to destroy, stays intact. The facilities and gear, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is important is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have developed more powerful, more united, and more endorsing of the administration and the country in the aftermath of this attack."